handle cash
abroad?
By Kulamarva Balakrishna
Vienna,Friday,January 18,2008: In December
last year, I pointed out how the new born
Organization of Islamic Conference, managed
to hoodwink the United Nations on Human
Rights and =terror development assistance=
in the name of =South South Co-operation=.
These gawd´s single vote democratic devils
have time and again shown their devious
routes for deceiving the world.Not that Saudi
sons of female camels are only terrorists
abroad.Do not entertain that mis conception.
They are terrorists to their own mothers,
sisters,daughters and daughter in law.What
is more, they have proved themselves showing
disrespect to the mother of Islam, Khadija
bint Khuwaylid alias Khadija tul Kubra,who
gave job to Muhammed,MPBUH (may peace
be upon her) married him, gave him own
children and when he was shivering
at the first revealation of Q´uran, comforted
him.Today, the female camel´s children
treat girls like worse than door mats either
their own daughters or their imported
housemaids.
Now the American Campus Watch is
pointing us the hidden ways of Saudi funds
going behind George Bush into American
educational institutions as charity.I am
publishing the contents here so my Indian
readers can understand how the desert
snakes hide themselves.A time has come
for the world to tame the desert democrats
holding a single vote of an imaginary gawd,
misusing their camp follower mullah mobs
voting rights in foreign territories to them.
We have to look at only our brother country
Pakistan,where they have a running genocide
program for charity of course.They are
howling about =self determination= for
Kashmir.Where is self determination for
normal Saudis under female camel´s son
King Narakasura La Ilaha Abdullah?
President Bush may be the proud recipient
of American female genital mutilation
by product pendant as the highest sand
land award.That shows he indeed shared
his gawd and bed with the democrat King
in his ranch to get inspiration to advise
Egyptian elected President Hosni Mubarak
on =democratic reform=. Long live George
Bush like Ronald Reagan and Ariel Sharon.
Campus Watch condenced text:
What Influence Does
Saudi Money Buy
in the U.S.?
By Asaf Romirowsky
(The manager of Israel & Middle East Affairs
for the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia)
An Islamic group came to Temple University last
spring with an offer of 1.5 million dollars for an
endowed chair in Islamic studies to honor professor
Mahmoud Ayoub. After months of talks, the trustees
raised concerns about the contributor, the
International Institute of Islamic Thought,alleged
nonprofit research group which was under scrutiny
by the government in search of the funding of
suspected terrorists.Some would like to consider
money given by Saudis and other Arabs to American
universities as generous gifts to the U.S. universities
who educated their elites. A closer look reveals a
different picture that includes incitement, and a
skewed view of Islam.
There have been cases when universities turning
down funds. In July 2000, the Harvard Divinity
School accepted 2.5 million dollars from the ruler
of the United Arab Emirates, Sheik Zayed bin
Sultan al-Nahyan, (the same man who financed
the Bank of Credit and Commerce International
BCCI for short)to endow a chair in Islamic Religious
Studies.But Rachel Fish, a divinity student,and a
founding member of the University Graduate-Students
Friends of Israel, raised an uproar, documenting
the Sheik's inhuman anti-Semitic ties.
The Harvard administration was forced to face
facts who was offering the funds -- and why. As
a result, the money was rejected.But this is not
the norm. Several years ago, a multi million gift
from the Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal was shared
between Harvard and Georgetown universities.
These subversive funding efforts began in the 1960s
and '70s, with Muslim donors funneling millions of
dollars into American universities to support Islamic
studies, hire faculty specialists in Islam, and fund
the writing of books and seminars on the topic.
Such support represents one of the biggest problems
academia faces today -- that is, how to conclude a
balanced discussion when it relates to funds of Mideast
studies.
Within academic circles, individual views are often
turned into a political litmus test.For example,
Fouad Ajami, the articulate interpreter of Arab
culture and politics who teaches at Johns Hopkins
University, has been subject to scathing attacks
from Arab critics. These critics find his scholarship
faulty,because they see him as too soft on the
question of Israel, = the enemy=.As we educate
ourselves and the next generation about Israel
and the Middle East, we should question the
sheer amount of cash being offered and the
influence these people are thereby buying,
creating bastions of noncritical, pro-Islamic
scholarship within academia.(ned)
No comments:
Post a Comment